Over a year ago I met with my (former) bishop in his office.
I warned him the
LDS Church was bleeding membership and we needed to respond. “What can we
do?” I asked. I noted that tens of thousands of well meaning, obedient, sincere,
studious and intelligent people in the Church – as well as countless millions outside of it -- were finding
information on the internet that turned them away from the faith.
With revulsion.
Why?
Because the information they found online was true.
I knew this because all
of my extended family, many of my closest
friends, even most of those I faithfully
brought to the waters of baptism by missionary efforts were later “turned off”
by what they discovered outside of Sunday School. If they were interested in
the LDS message before they got online, they certainly weren’t afterward. Even those who (miraculously)
joined the Church anyway left it once they encountered more truth than what the Church was forthrightly disclosing.
What could be so bad?
The
Mormon Church has a sordid, sinful past, littered with lies, adultery, even
murder. (And that describes only a fraction of the leaders’ sins! Wait ‘til you meet the members!) Such mishaps,
mistakes, mischief and mayhem are mixed together with the wonderful, glorious
goodness that is God’s revelation to mankind in these latter days. (I’m not
being facetious, even if it sounds that way. It is a marvelous work
and wonder. I’m still marveling…and wondering!)
Traditionally, the Church has dealt with embarrassing
revelations of its past by concealing them.
Now the Church pays millions of dollars to insure that its “official”, masterfully-produced websites and media presentations “pop up” first or
second on most search engines, “crowding out” other sources of information. I’m
sure they do this just to “get the word out”. But that hasn’t altogether hidden
other truths or stanched the flow of
those leaving the faith. (“It’s never the crime, but the cover-up!”) Hiding the
truth just doesn’t “work” in this “information”
age.
2 For there is nothing covered,
that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known.
3 Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in
darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear
in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops. – Luke 12:2-3
Even slick
PR campaigns just won’t “cut it”. When people find out the whole truth about the Church (good and bad) from outside sources, they feel betrayed. They feel lied to. If they’re
tenuous in the faith or ambivalent, they just “walk away”. But if they are
devout, faithful members of the Church -- “all in” as it were, having devoted
their entire lives to the cause -- quite often they react, first with
disbelief, then shock, then anger. Quite often they become enemies of the Church. They commonly abandon belief in anything.
That’s just not a good place to be: between a rock and a hard
place.
Those were the people I sought to help. People in our own
ward and stake. People who were no longer coming to Church. People like my
friends and family, who dismissed the Church out-of-hand. But the bishop
disagreed. “Let the Brethren handle it!” he said. “They know what they’re
doing! Don’t teach anything [even truthful history] unless and until the
Brethren teach it!” he advised. (My failure to comply with that “advice”
apparently got me excommunicated, even though I held no “teaching” calling,
served in no “leadership” capacity or taught anything “false” that I know of.
Everything I have taught is here on
this blog, so you decide.)
But I do have a
testimony. The “normal” stuff that “freaks” some people out and causes others
to leave or reject the LDS faith has no
effect on me. My faith isn’t
grounded in scientific “facts”. (Though I think science is important. That’s
why I teach it! But science is often wrong.) My faith isn’t grounded in men or their
testimonies. (Because I
have my own!) Things that apparently blow people out of the baptismal font,
as it were, to my point of view, seem almost trivial. (But they certainly aren’t
trivial to them!) These issues take on even greater importance in the minds of
some inasmuch as they appear to be dismissed or ignored by Church leaders. Even
a pebble in one’s shoe becomes an immobilizing
stumbling block, if not removed.
Many people, apparently, are now losing their faith because
of such pebbles. I tried to correct that in Primary, Priesthood, Sunday School,
and Sacrament Meeting. Denver
Snuffer tried to correct it, too, in many more (and wonderful) ways than I
could. He has been able to “rescue” many.
We all make
mistakes. Honest people know that. Wise people expect it. And real people who pretend to be “holier
than thou” only make “unbelievers” of those who otherwise would be capable of exercising
faith. (That’s why confessed sinners and reprobates – like Peter, Paul, Alma
and Alma, Jr. – were such effective ministers for Christ. They followed Christ and relied upon His virtues
and power, not their own (or those of other men). With that in mind, Elder
Dieter F. Uchtdorf recently made this
necessary and refreshing confession.
But it’s not enough. The Church’s
official statement supporting the asking of questions about LDS doctrine,
history and practice lags behind the leaderships’ ability to answer those
questions or their willingness to have those questions answered -- particularly
if the answers (however truthful) conflict with modern Church doctrine or practice. If “[s]imply asking questions
has never constituted apostasy”, then answering
them certainly has -- if the LDS leadership doesn’t like what you have to say!
The LDS Church is now a hard place to find and speak the
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. It’s also a hard place to
stand up and bear witness of “uncomfortable” truths. Perhaps this explains why its
leadership is currently displeased with the efforts of Rock
Waterman. Or John Dehlin. They
are certainly “concerned” with the efforts of Tim
Malone. Denver
Snuffer’s efforts were very displeasing to the Brethren. So were mine. If
this continues, we may all be “apostates” eventually.
The LDS First Presidency defines
apostasy as "repeatedly acting in clear, open, and deliberate public
opposition to the Church or its faithful leaders, or persisting, after
receiving counsel, in teaching false doctrine.” I was charged with the latter. Perhaps someone will get around to one day telling me what “false doctrine” I actually
taught. You would think that a concerned Church leader – if he really
cared about me or my family – would have gotten on my blog and made a timely,
corrective comment or two once they discovered I had gone astray. (I have
erased nothing of criticism or
correction on this blog.) Especially since they used my blog as the “principal
witness” against me at my
disciplinary hearing! (They obviously had time to read it! They just didn’t have the inclination or ability to respond to it! Apparently, excommunication is preferable to communication.)
The idea that apostasy could potentially amount to openly disagreeing about anything with any
priesthood leader or publicly failing to do (or not do) anything they ask shocks the conscience and sensibilities of all who
know that men (even Church men) can and (often) do make mistakes and go astray.
Do we surrender our agency to men when we come unto Christ? Does holding a
leadership calling in the LDS Church render one’s pronouncements and opinions
equivalent to those of God? I have known enough good LDS leaders to know that
-- while they are generally trustworthy – I would never trust my salvation entirely to any of them! I can’t even get an “official” hometeacher to come to my house! (I wonder if the leaders are worried for the “spiritual safety” of any potential
hometeacher they might send our way!)
I don’t want to get too far astray here. I’m “done” with the
LDS Church anyway. I will never go back (under the current regime). Not that they would
have me. (They have
made that abundantly clear.) When
I asked for bread, they gave me a stone. ‘Nuff said.
But the gospel is
still true.
It is impossible
to exercise faith in falsehood. We all believe falsehoods, to some extent, but faith
to move mountains must be grounded in
truth in order to be efficacious. That’s
why knowing the truth is so
important. A little leaven of lies leavens the whole lump. What is already an incredible story proclaimed by earnest
missionaries is only made less palatable
and even more unbelievable when it is
corrupted with demonstrable and unnecessary falsehoods. That’s why the LDS Church,
in my view, has to “come clean” and is now largely failing in its mission despite its noble efforts to do
otherwise. They have tossed Jeremiah into the pit, but that will not silence
him or change the truthfulness of his message.
The LDS have disbelieved their own leaders:
“If we have the truth, it cannot be
harmed by investigation. If we have not the truth, it ought to be harmed.” – J.
Reuben Clark[1]
“It is better not to have so much faith as to
believe all the lies.” -- Hyrum Smith
The LDS Church now claims 15 million members.
But less than a third of those,
perhaps, occupy the pews on any given Sunday. (The Church counts all those in attendance each week and knows the exact number who
show up, but won’t reveal the statistics. Why?) On my mission in Chile, I
served in a ward that experienced as many as 20 baptisms per month, year after year! But the size of that ward
never changed. Why? Because just as many were going out the back door
as were coming in the front! Having served
as a ward financial clerk, I have witnessed that only a fraction of those on
the membership rolls, even of those attending Church regularly, pay a full
tithe. This is true even in our relatively “rich” U.S. ward. The ranks of the “true
and faithful” and “fully converted” are truly small, indeed.
I was one of them. I still am. I imagine I always will be.
But not because
I’m “converted” to the LDS Church. Or because I’m a “follower” of any man or
men. Christians don’t need another
reason, motivation, program, or person to tell them to do missionary work or to
live the gospel. If they do,
they’re not real Christians. Or they have
fallen away from Christ.
I am converted to Christ. I am also convinced of the
truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. I am persuaded by the prophetic (however imperfect)
ministry of Joseph Smith. I don’t know what that makes me. I’m no longer a
“Latter-day Saint”. I’m also certainly
not a “Mormon”.
But I am a Christian who seeks after and strives to accept
truth wherever he finds it. That’s
how I got here.
I can “excuse” the sins of others…because I am aware of my
own. I can believe the testimony of
modern prophets…because I have experienced the same for myself. I can have faith in Jesus Christ…because He
has ministered to me, by the power of the Holy Ghost, and I have tasted of His
kindness, His gentleness, and His all-consuming love.
It's that knowledge – and my reminding myself of the same –
that enables me to erect
an impenetrable wall against sin. Any man who says he knows God and
intentionally sins is a liar. For
our God is a
God of all-consuming love. (To know Him is to love Him…and to feel His
love.) Who would ever sin against that?
Most skeptics and disbelievers – even those who were once members
of the LDS Church and formerly lived the gospel in its fullness -- will admit
that the fruits of doing so were real
and beneficial. Lives were changed for the better. Faithful family ties were
strengthened and improved. Peace and joy were the result of exercising faith in
Jesus Christ. These are the
“evidence” Alma spoke of.
But are Latter-day Saints the only ones whose lives are changed for the better? Are LDS families
the only ones who are strong and
happy? Do the LDS alone enjoy peace
and joy in this life? Hardly!
But I have known no greater.
Even so, many Latter-day Saints are now choking on sour milk,
unable to digest rotten meat.
The Church’s response to all this has been, first, to bury
the truth and, second, to kill the messenger. Rock
Waterman is high on the “hit list”. A minor footnote, I have already been “scratched
off”. (Call me an “investigator”.) Publishing
one’s “findings” without mixing in an obsequious measure of adulation and
subservience to LDS authority will all but guarantee only censure and
expulsion from the fold. The truth of God will
go forth boldly, nobly and independent – but it may have to do so outside the LDS Church!
The gospel remains unchanged. Men and women, and even young
children, are saved by exercising faith in Jesus Christ,
the Eternal God. He manifests
Himself unto all nations, even unto as many as will believe.
We are truly in the days spoken of by Ezekiel in Ez 34, when the shepherds would feed themselves but fail to feed the flock. Yet, the Master will seek out His sheep and He will feed them and bring them to the mountains of Zion. There are many who feel just as your do Will, both in and out of The Church, Inc. The Church, Inc. IS NOT THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST. Be of good cheer dear brother.
ReplyDeleteJR
I do believe the vast majority (I hope) of "shepherds" in the LDS Church act unselfishly and faithfully, striving to serve both God and man. Really. We (I can't help it) have a remarkable crew of virtuous men and women striving to do right.
DeleteBut the institution -- the "corporate" manifestation of Mormonism -- is not the Church. It is, at best, a "group effort" to worship God and to do good works. I cannot vouch for those in charge at the very top, however. I do not know them well enough. What an awesome (awful) burden to bear! I do not envy them. Few men (if any) could bear that burden well.
No wonder the four sons of Mosiah said "No, thank you!" once they were converted and the kingdom was offered to them. They had their priorities straight. Pity any man (or woman) called to leadership in the LDS Church. He (or she) deserves our prayers.
"Do the LDS alone enjoy peace and joy in this life? Hardly!"
ReplyDeleteBetter question: "Are none but LDS baptized by fire?"
I have found none outside of the Church.
And few within it.
DeleteI, like you, served as ward financial clerk for about 5 1/2 years. And, like you, I noticed that the number of folks to paid an amount that would likely be a full tithe was relatively small.
ReplyDeleteMy theory on church membership and activity went something like this: 15,000,000 members of record. If we assume that 1/2 of those are in church each week, we cut that number to 7,500,000. Of those, perhaps half (if you're generous) pay a full tithe. That leaves 3,750,000. And, of those, perhaps half (maybe a bit more) hold current temple recommends. That leaves 1,875,000.
The church refuses to release any statistics to back these numbers up, but my observations as a clerk tend to back them up, at least in my ward. Even among endowed members, relatively few hold temple recommends.
Unfortunately, some of the Church's actions of late have pushed me into a more skeptical point of view. The biggest "issue" was the opening of the City Creek Mall in Salt Lake. Regardless of how it was paid for (and we don't know, since the church doesn't release financial reports), I could not continue to pay a full tithe to an organization that, to me, has one foot in Babylon and one in Zion. After 31 years of always paying a full tithe on gross (and fast offerings on top of that), I quit. I'd had enough.
The Church is free to do as it pleases with its money, as am I. But, I'm now far more questioning about a lot of what the corporate Church is up to than I ever was as a die-hard believer.
Great blog. Thanks for letting me share my thoughs.
Michael, your conclusions about City Creek Mall are astute. You may find Rock Waterman's posts about tithing of interest.
Delete"Are We Paying Too Much Tithing?" http://puremormonism.blogspot.com/2012/12/are-we-paying-too-much-tithing.html
"Bare Necessities: How To Calculate What You Owe In Tithing" http://puremormonism.blogspot.com/2014/02/bare-necessities-how-to-calculate-what.html
Thank you so much for your blog. This, and others like it have been very helpful for me. I have read all of Denver's Snuffer's books and his blog for several years. I also enjoy Rock Waterman. As a member of the LDS church, I have become so disillusioned and concerned about so many things. Like the above commenter, I believe my biggest concerns lie in the accounting of the money. In any case, I am struggling with the decision of leaving the church or waiting for them to kick me out. I have been quietly attending my meetings and doing my duties and it becomes increasingly difficult to do so. The problem is that I have a number of children and I have been taught for so many years that our salvation is at stake that I feel very scared to lead them astray. I realize this comment is a little wandering and also that no one can make my decision but me; my husband, thankfully, is on the same page. How have others handled this dilemma. I get the idea that it is of some importance how you leave. I understand that the LDS church is still the vehicle the Lord currently has for distributing priesthood blessings. What do I sacrifice for my children's salvation if they are not participating in these ordinances? How can they "marry in the temple" if they haven't been in church? How important is that? I have no problem or difficulty in teaching the gospel in my home. I already do that very well and very thoroughly. Is that enough?
Delete@Jonas -
DeleteThanks for the reply. I've thoroughly enjoyed reading Rock's posts and I think he's probably pretty close to accurate as to how tithing should really be paid. I'm sure that's something the Church doesn't want heard, and which, I'm sure, is part of what is behind his priesthood leaders starting the process of bringing action against him.
@ Confused -
I am in a similar situation. These issues I have with the way the LDS Church utilizes their various income streams have caused a fair amount of upheaval in my own home. And, while my wife is sympathetic, she is not necessarily of the same thinking that I am. So, for the time being, I continue to attend meetings and I try hard to keep my mouth shut, but it is NOT easy.
This is the issue I keep bringing up with my wife - how do I reconcile a church that claims to be the "only way to salvation" yet does seemingly stupid things like building malls and maintaining reserves where the wealthy can hunt, among other things?
Truth is, I can't reconcile the two and it is eating me alive trying to decide how to proceed.